Erik Hjalmarsson and Tamas Kiss, "Long-Run Predictability Tests Are Even Worse Than You Thought", Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 37, No. 7, 2022, pp. 1334-1355. ***** Data ***** Our empirical analysis uses monthly international equity returns, in excess of a local risk free rate. The file "hk-files.zip" contains the file "data.csv" which includes the original data. The column headers include variable names as follows: -- 'Country' is the total monthly equity return -- 'Country'_rf is the risk free rate in the given country -- 'SP500_ret' is the total return on the S&P 500 index -- 'Rfree' is the annual riskfree rate in the US 'Country' takes the following values in the dataset: Austria Austrlia (Australia) Belgium Canada Denmark Finland France HongKong Ireland Italy Nethrlnd (the Netherlands) NewZland (New Zeland) Norway Singapor Spain Sweden UK (the United Kingdom) There are 1140 rows (observations) in the data file, but the number of effective observations varies by country. Data were sourced from Kenneth French's Data Library (for equity returns) and Macrobond (for the risk free rates). For further details, please consult Section 6.1 in the paper. ***** Reproducing the empirical results ***** The empirical results presented in the paper (Table 5) can be reproduced in three steps using the files in "hk-files.zip". 1. Most of the regression results can be obtained via running "empirical_analysis.do" in Stata (version 16 or later, the package "outreg" should be available). Results will be displayed in the Results window in Stata (please disregard the first two rows in the Stata output). 2. The 5% critical values can be obtained by using the "tstat_cv.m" file in the folder "Matlab" via the following syntax: cv=tstat_cv(q,T,delta), where 'cv' is the desired 5% critical value, 'q' is the horizon, 'T' is the sample size and 'delta' is the correlation between u and v. 3. Bootstrapped critical values can be obtained by running "bootstrap_calc_to_paper.m" in the folder "Matlab". Results will be shown in the command window. Any deviations of the results from Table 5 are due to the random nature of the bootstrap procedure (step 3).